Is Prova (Kifak Inta) - Fairuz Halal or Haram?
Across the schools of thought analyzed, the highest verdict for "Prova (Kifak Inta) - Fairuz" is Grey Area (3/5).
| School | Verdict |
|---|---|
| Sistani | Haram (1/5) |
| Khamenei | Grey Area (3/5) |
| Hanafi | Not yet analyzed — Hanafi's general music ruling |
| Maliki | Not yet analyzed — Maliki's general music ruling |
| Shafi'i | Not yet analyzed — Shafi'i's general music ruling |
| Hanbali | Not yet analyzed — Hanbali's general music ruling |
Is Prova (Kifak Inta) - Fairuz halal according to Sistani?
Haram (1/5). Under the rulings of Grand Ayatollah Sistani (al-Fiqh lil-Mughtaribeen, Book 46), the central criterion is the Expert Recognition Test: whether the melody and vocal delivery are suitable for entertainment and amusement gatherings (majālis al-lahw wal-la'ib). Sistani defines forbidden singing (al-ghinā') as an entertaining expression delivered in tunes customary to professional entertainers.
Is Prova (Kifak Inta) - Fairuz halal according to Khamenei?
Grey Area (3/5). Under Ayatollah Khamenei's jurisprudential methodology (Booklet 32 / Ghinā va Mūsīqī dars khārij & Official Q&A Q1121-Q1159), musical sounds and singing are prohibited only when they are lahwī—defined as music that deviates a person from Allah, moral virtues, and obligations, driving them toward sin and heedlessness (Q1121, Q1123).
Each school’s full reasoning — the evidence cited, where the scholars differ, and how the score was reached — continues for members.
Open the full per-school analysis →
How Islamic rulings on music work · Sistani's ruling · Khamenei's ruling · How scores are calculated
Halalify Music is an educational tool, not a fatwa service.
